![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Geek Speak - Tech Forum All things technology oriented. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is a map of the cables:
http://www.reach.com/imap/imap.html somewhere else is better map, but have lost it.
__________________
rm -rf /religion |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Problem is that most of our international content is from the USA (surprise surprise), and we're down to two (three if you count Southern-X southern leg) low latency routes to the interwebz... I hear there is a new trans-Pac consortium cable in the wings now, which ought to help things along... but that must be at least three years away, if it ever eventuates. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can't actually embed the video, but: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politi...220-19335.html
I think the NBN is a fucking joke. 10 years?! By then, there will guaranteed to be a super advanced form of internet technology, and then the NBN will come out and make our Internet connections look like a fucking joke! |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Prejudices are what fools use for reason. Voltaire |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Talking about websites, in 2001 we didn't have dynamic multimedia applications and rich internet applications to the extent we have now. Who knows what we'll have by 2021 - technology does evolve with time, and usually it doesn't take long. |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
The NBN is more about the infrastructure especially covering the "last mile" problem.
If you just consider it that the government is simply laying miles of fibre optic cable and it goes right to your front door, then I think that it is a good thing. Yes, what we consider to be acceptable internet speeds today will be disgustingly slow in 10 years time, but the speed of light will still be the same. Our current copper network is running into issues. I had it recently at home, my ADSL2 speed went south, and it took a month to find the problem. The fault was with the line between the Unit's MDF and the connection on the street. James |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/...39580432731220 |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not suggesting anything will exceed the speed of light, but of course new things do pop up. The budget may increase, for example.
Although wireless technology is improving neverthless, but I doubt it will replace wired technology any time soon at this stage. And with the light-speed network, comes the catch of a possible Internet filter which Conroy wants to introduce; this centralized filtering mechanism he appears to be proposing will slow the otherwise fast Internet connection. Of course, so far I'm seeing more talk and very little doing, but in this case I hope I am horribly wrong. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As I understand it (and feel free to correct me as I'm sure there are many here better educated on this than I), fibre wire has potential transfer speeds of up to (almost) the speed of light and so far there have not even been any scientific findings (let alone the following technological development) for more efficient technologies. Having said that it does seem that replacement technologies for fibre are a good several decades off at least (these things take time from discovery to testing to implementation).
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/...39580432731220 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|