Go Back   AFA Forums > Atheism > Call to action

Call to action Call out to atheist activism on polls, news articles, petitions or other injustice. Let everyone know we have a voice.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #51  
Old 3rd January 2018, 10:47 AM
yowie's Avatar
yowie yowie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Dun Manifestin
Posts: 205
Default Re: Religious Freedom review

Public submissions to Philip Ruddock's review of religious freedom to be kept secret.

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politi...02-h0cbsf.html

Quote:
Public submissions to the Turnbull government's review of religious freedom in Australia will be kept secret, in a marked departure from normal processes, according to Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull's department.

The department, which has control of the inquiry, said it would not publish the submissions, which is in stark contrast to ordinary parliamentary inquiries, in which most submissions are automatically released.
just. wow.
__________________
.....
Every class has a clown ... Carpe Jugulum
Reply With Quote
Thank The Irreverent Mr Black, Strato, DanDare thanked this post
  #52  
Old 7th January 2018, 06:25 PM
TokenSkeptic's Avatar
TokenSkeptic TokenSkeptic is offline
AFA Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 843
Default Re: Religious Freedom review

I'm currently looking over the submission requirements, any brainstorming to help with a draft is greatly appreciated!
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 7th January 2018, 06:31 PM
Cloud Shouter's Avatar
Cloud Shouter Cloud Shouter is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Perth
Posts: 3
Default Re: Religious Freedom review

@ Yowie
What else do we expect from Mrs Trumble? She is beholden to the right wing hence appointing that septuagenarian fascist Ruddock. They daren't publish the submissions or we would see who is really going to write the legislation...One Nashun, The Church and the ACL...whooppedy do. Who woulda thunk it, hey?
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 7th January 2018, 06:35 PM
The Irreverent Mr Black's Avatar
The Irreverent Mr Black The Irreverent Mr Black is offline
Fucked Off, Working On A Story
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toontown
Posts: 5,207
Default Re: Religious Freedom review

Quote:
TokenSkeptic said View Post
I'm currently looking over the submission requirements, any brainstorming to help with a draft is greatly appreciated!
That old AFA submission on charities (Senate Enquiry, I think) - HERE may have some bearing on the fiscal side.

I'll sit down for a Hard Think about the general thingy, and may submit a note or two.
__________________

vibrators are WRONG and unnatural the bible said adam and eve not florence and the machine
— Becky (@SAlNTKARDASHIAN) May 18, 2016

Reply With Quote
Like DanDare liked this post
  #55  
Old 7th January 2018, 06:42 PM
pipbarber's Avatar
pipbarber pipbarber is offline
AFA Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,062
Default Re: Religious Freedom review

Quote:
TokenSkeptic said View Post
I'm currently looking over the submission requirements, any brainstorming to help with a draft is greatly appreciated!
I don't know what should go into a formal AFA submission. However, it would seem strategic to point out that preserving religious freedom means all religions, not just xtianity. You want religious freedom to be a christian bigot then you also protect Muslim freedom to be Islamic bigots, Rastafarian freedom to smoke enormous reefers, FLDS men to marry as many women as they damn well want to...and so on.

That and the fact that religious freedom has already resulted in one royal commission, do they long for another?
__________________
Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 7th January 2018, 06:49 PM
The Irreverent Mr Black's Avatar
The Irreverent Mr Black The Irreverent Mr Black is offline
Fucked Off, Working On A Story
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toontown
Posts: 5,207
Default Re: Religious Freedom review

@PipB: Maybe not. There's private and public expression and practice, and they differ.

Brother Vern (Hi, you grumpy old turd!) can believe I'm bound for hell, and infested by a large number of demons, if he likes (in private).

The moment he starts vituperatin' up in my face or preventing me from buying a cake for my Damnation Anniversary, purely on account of my apostasy, he's vilifying me.
__________________

vibrators are WRONG and unnatural the bible said adam and eve not florence and the machine
— Becky (@SAlNTKARDASHIAN) May 18, 2016

Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 7th January 2018, 07:33 PM
pipbarber's Avatar
pipbarber pipbarber is offline
AFA Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,062
Default Re: Religious Freedom review

Yes but this is a review into protecting freedom of ‘practice,’ isn’t it? Which could mean anything, depending on belief.
__________________
Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 7th January 2018, 07:35 PM
The Irreverent Mr Black's Avatar
The Irreverent Mr Black The Irreverent Mr Black is offline
Fucked Off, Working On A Story
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toontown
Posts: 5,207
Default Re: Religious Freedom review

Quote:
pipbarber said View Post
Yes but this is a review into protecting freedom of ‘practice,’ isn’t it? Which could mean anything, depending on belief.
Wouldn't really want anything (like confessionals or bigotry) getting free kicks where common law is concerned, would we?
__________________

vibrators are WRONG and unnatural the bible said adam and eve not florence and the machine
— Becky (@SAlNTKARDASHIAN) May 18, 2016

Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 8th January 2018, 12:58 AM
DanDare's Avatar
DanDare DanDare is offline
Religion or Reality, choose...
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,453
Default Re: Religious Freedom review

Quote:
Strato said View Post
They have a bloke who identifies as a Jesuit priest, Father Frank Brennan on the panel. Not sure why everybody compliantly refers to him by the anachronistic appellation 'Father.' He's supposed to be celibate. I don't give a damn if he is. Spiritual father is meaningless, quite deceptive, an oxymoron.

Do they have a self declaring atheist on the panel? If not, why not?

I'll betcha they don't.

Quote:
One member of the panel, University of Queensland constitutional law professor Nicholas Aroney has argued religious freedom is becoming "at best a second-class right" as "anti-discrimination law is increasingly prioritised".

Professor Aroney, Mr Ruddock and the other panelists including Human Rights Commissioner Rosalind Croucher, Federal Court Judge Annabelle Bennett and Jesuit priest Father Frank Brennan are due to hand down their findings in March.
I've met Frank a couple of times. He holds back, talks calmly and plays the long game.
__________________
"History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government".
-Thomas Jefferson

Burden of proof is the obligation on somebody presenting a claim to provide evidence to support its truth (a warrant). Once evidence has been presented, it is up to any opposing "side" to show the evidence presented is not adequate. If claims were accepted without warrants, then every claim could simultaneously be claimed to be true.

History isn't written by the victors. It's written by the people with the time machines.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 8th January 2018, 01:01 AM
DanDare's Avatar
DanDare DanDare is offline
Religion or Reality, choose...
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,453
Default Re: Religious Freedom review

Quote:
pipbarber said View Post
Quote:
TokenSkeptic said View Post
I'm currently looking over the submission requirements, any brainstorming to help with a draft is greatly appreciated!
I don't know what should go into a formal AFA submission. However, it would seem strategic to point out that preserving religious freedom means all religions, not just xtianity. You want religious freedom to be a christian bigot then you also protect Muslim freedom to be Islamic bigots, Rastafarian freedom to smoke enormous reefers, FLDS men to marry as many women as they damn well want to...and so on.

That and the fact that religious freedom has already resulted in one royal commission, do they long for another?
And freedom from religions. That implies religions cannot be imposed. That is the core of secularism.
__________________
"History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government".
-Thomas Jefferson

Burden of proof is the obligation on somebody presenting a claim to provide evidence to support its truth (a warrant). Once evidence has been presented, it is up to any opposing "side" to show the evidence presented is not adequate. If claims were accepted without warrants, then every claim could simultaneously be claimed to be true.

History isn't written by the victors. It's written by the people with the time machines.
Reply With Quote
Like Strato liked this post
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.