Go Back   AFA Forums > Atheism > General Chit Chat About Atheism

General Chit Chat About Atheism Something on your mind?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11th March 2016, 04:21 PM
workmx's Avatar
workmx workmx is offline
Feminazi and semi-professional inconoclast
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 6,153
Default Skeptheism: Is Knowledge of God’s Existence Possible?

Skeptheism: Is Knowledge of God’s Existence Possible?

http://philpapers.org/archive/MIZSIK.pdf

Abstract: In this paper, I sketch an argument for the view that we cannot know (or have good reasons to believe) that God exists. Some call this view "strong agnosticism" but I prefer the term "skeptheism" in order to clearly distinguish between two distinct epistemic attitudes with respect to the existence of God, namely, agnosticism and skepticism. For the skeptheist, we cannot know (or have good reasons to believe) that God exists, since there can be neither conceptual (a priori) nor empirical (a posteriori) evidence for the existence of God.

Keywords: agnosticism; atheism; skeptheism; theism
__________________
Forgive me, I'm a sociologist and high horse slut!
Reply With Quote
Like Strato liked this post
  #2  
Old 11th March 2016, 11:05 PM
Spearthrower Spearthrower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,119
Default Re: Skeptheism: Is Knowledge of God’s Existence Possible?

Interesting, but need to eat before reading. Will leave this: if God is all powerful and all-knowing, then knowledge of God would come down to whether She wanted us to know of Her. Assuming she did, we would all know. Assuming she didn't, none of us would.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12th March 2016, 12:30 PM
Ernie's Avatar
Ernie Ernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 147
Default Re: Skeptheism: Is Knowledge of God’s Existence Possible?

Hi Workmx.
I’ve spent the past seven years looking at the question of what we can know (including existence of phenomena such as “gods”).
My views are as follows. Your proposed argument looks as though it is an epistemological one. However, the subject area appears to have been “done to death”. As I see it, the active branch of epistemology that is supportive of religion has religious roots. It will tend to produce work that has different inferences to that done by epistemologists with a secular background.
Moreover, I think that “proofs” of the existence of gods raise a Gettier “type” problem, in that what might seem to be a definite sign of the existence of a God to the religious, might indicate something entirely different to a person with no religious inclinations.
I’ve found some of the recent writings on epistemology to be overly verbose and at times grossly pretentious exercises in semantics. Of all the writings I’ve encountered to date, the views of Bertrand Russell seem to me to provide answers most suited to our post-modern era (at least to the part of it that has actually arrived). Russell views “knowledge” on a scale: there is “knowledge” that is highly probable, that which is less probable, and “knowledge” that is highly improbable. Of course, at this juncture, we could debate the appropriateness of the word “knowledge”. To me, Russell’s view conjures up propositions being portrayed on a Likert scale. Arguments proposing the sun rising tomorrow have weight greater than nine, but I only place a one against the strength of the argument for gods.
The problem is that a very large section of the population appears to crave certainty: but (except for simple or general things) there is none. Our post-modern era recognises this and is a sceptical one. I think there are more worthy projects for philosophical endeavour than “proof” of the existence of Gods.
These are my personal opinions. However, due to pressing issues, I may not be able to continue debate (people can always PM me to convey comments). However, I will join in future philosophical discussion when I can. I highly recommend Bertand Russell’s Human Knowledge and Basic Writings (both published by Routledge) .
Ernie
__________________
Faith is believing what you know ain't so - from Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2016, 12:31 PM
Ernie
This message has been deleted by Ernie. Reason: Duplicated
  #4  
Old 12th March 2016, 01:25 PM
Ernie's Avatar
Ernie Ernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 147
Default Re: Skeptheism: Is Knowledge of God’s Existence Possible?

I forgot to say that a priori knowledge is (I think) a Kantian proposition. However, even contributions from the religious good ol' US (gard’s chosen folk) admit the concept lacks empirical support.

Ernie
__________________
Faith is believing what you know ain't so - from Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12th March 2016, 02:53 PM
bruce1937's Avatar
bruce1937 bruce1937 is online now
AFA Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kilmore
Posts: 2,712
Default Re: Skeptheism: Is Knowledge of God’s Existence Possible?

It all depends on how you define this "God" concept.
__________________
The meaning of your life, is what you choose to make it.
Reply With Quote
Like hackenslash liked this post
  #6  
Old 12th March 2016, 04:20 PM
Ernie's Avatar
Ernie Ernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 147
Default Re: Skeptheism: Is Knowledge of God’s Existence Possible?

Bruce 1937

I’ll try a definition of god. A human construct (possibly in reaction to the fear of death) used by promoters to gain control over the gullible. For the past twelve hundred years various versions of religious superstition (especially christianity) have been used as instruments of control over the masses (for instance, through the alleged divine right of kings). Religious superstitions are now in decline (possibly as a result of rising levels of education and the despicable actions of the religious).
Ernie
__________________
Faith is believing what you know ain't so - from Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13th March 2016, 02:02 PM
wearestardust's Avatar
wearestardust wearestardust is offline
What me socialist?
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: not telling
Posts: 8,511
Default Re: Skeptheism: Is Knowledge of God’s Existence Possible?

I'll put out my views and then come back after reading the article.

In short, I have always been a bit perplexed by suggestions that knowledge of is impossible, for relevant and interesting gods, anyway. The deist god who created everything and buggered off: sure, can't know about that(*). But the god of Abrahamic religions could easily demonstrate it's existence. If one considers the gods of some religions that are sort of a bit magical but otherwise more or less super-humans - like the Norse gods - again, knowledge of them would be perfectly straightforward. No-one in the Marvel universe seems to have an essential epistemic problem with Thor. Ditto gods in between.

I can't help feeling that efforts to derive atheism from meanings of words, or quibbles about epistemology, are just the flip side of efforts in the same vein by theists. And the response to the atheist effort has to be the same as to the theists when they try to derive god from definitions, or a priori principles, or some point about epistemology: but what's your evidence?

I perhaps should declare here that I am a strong atheist.

Now to the article ...

(*) I was going to include the elder gods as well, but of course as H.P. Lovecraft points out, they didn't leave without a trace, like the deist creator.
__________________
If you need to wonder what would drive somebody to instruct lawyers, you may already be close to trouble.
- the Hircine Reverend

Last edited by wearestardust; 13th March 2016 at 02:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13th March 2016, 02:08 PM
wearestardust's Avatar
wearestardust wearestardust is offline
What me socialist?
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: not telling
Posts: 8,511
Default Re: Skeptheism: Is Knowledge of God’s Existence Possible?

Quote:
Ernie said View Post
I forgot to say that a priori knowledge is (I think) a Kantian proposition.

Ernie
Kant did think there is such a thing as a priori knowledge - more importantly, a priori synthetic knowledge, not just analytic knowledge that is true by definition or rules.

But Plato thought so too, of course.
__________________
If you need to wonder what would drive somebody to instruct lawyers, you may already be close to trouble.
- the Hircine Reverend
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14th March 2016, 11:28 PM
Strato's Avatar
Strato Strato is offline
What Me Deluded?
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: The Bellarine, Geelong.
Posts: 5,619
Default Re: Skeptheism: Is Knowledge of God’s Existence Possible?

Knowledge is a registration in the mind/brain, a construct which equates with reality or some aspect of reality.

Ultimately, empirical and quantifiable knowledge and logical proofs are all we can affirm as substantive knowledge, which can be shared, since we can allow that we all share the same senses, faculties for communication and cognizance of space and time.

There is no empirical evidence for God or the spiritual. Claims for God cannot be demonstrably equated with reality.
__________________
We can know something only if it is both true and knowable, Thinking Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman, 2011.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17th March 2016, 12:35 AM
DanDare's Avatar
DanDare DanDare is offline
Religion or Reality, choose...
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,453
Default Re: Skeptheism: Is Knowledge of God’s Existence Possible?

There is nothing to say about gods philosophically. Concrete descriptions with identifiable attributes cannot be found. All other gods are incoherent dreams or nightmares.
__________________
"History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government".
-Thomas Jefferson

Burden of proof is the obligation on somebody presenting a claim to provide evidence to support its truth (a warrant). Once evidence has been presented, it is up to any opposing "side" to show the evidence presented is not adequate. If claims were accepted without warrants, then every claim could simultaneously be claimed to be true.

History isn't written by the victors. It's written by the people with the time machines.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 01:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.