Go Back   AFA Forums > Science, Logic and Reason > Physical Sciences

Physical Sciences Physics, Chemistry, Geology, Astronomy, Mathematics etc

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 19th August 2012, 09:01 AM
Darwinsbulldog's Avatar
Darwinsbulldog Darwinsbulldog is offline
Science Mod
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 7,450
Default The Precise Solar Shape and Its Variability

Kuhn, J. R., R. Bush, et al. (2012). "The Precise Solar Shape and Its Variability." Science.
Quote:
The precise shape of the Sun has not been convincingly determined, despite half a century of modern photoelectric observations. The expected deviation of the solar limb shape from a perfect circle is very small, but such asphericity is sensitive to the Sun's otherwise invisible interior conditions as well as the solar atmosphere. From a long-running, space-based experiment, we show that, when analyzed with sufficiently high spatial resolution, the Sun's oblate shape is remarkably constant and almost completely unaffected by the solar cycle variability seen on its surface. The solar oblateness is substantially lower than theoretical expectations by an amount that could be accounted for by a slower differential rotation in the outer few percent of the Sun.
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/ea...23231.abstract

Eggsplanationz:-

Quote:
ScienceDaily (Aug. 16, 2012) — The sun is nearly the roundest object ever measured. If scaled to the size of a beach ball, it would be so round that the difference between the widest and narrow diameters would be much less than the width of a human hair.
The sun rotates every 28 days, and because it doesn't have a solid surface, it should be slightly flattened. This tiny flattening has been studied with many instruments for almost 50 years to learn about the sun's rotation, especially the rotation below its surface, which we can't see directly.
Now Jeff Kuhn and Isabelle Scholl (Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa), Rock Bush (Stanford University), and Marcelo Emilio (Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Brazil) have used the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) onboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory satellite to obtain what they believe is the definitive -- and baffling -- answer.
Because there is no atmosphere in space to distort the solar image, they were able to use HMI's exquisite image sensitivity to measure the solar shape with unprecedented accuracy. The results indicate that if the Sun were shrunk to a ball one meter in diameter, its equatorial diameter would be only 17 millionths of a meter larger than the diameter through its North-South pole, which is its rotation axis.
They also found that the solar flattening is remarkably constant over time and too small to agree with that predicted from its surface rotation. This suggests that other subsurface forces, like solar magnetism or turbulence, may be a more powerful influence than expected.
Kuhn, the team leader and first author of an article published Aug. 16 in Science Express, said, "For years we've believed our fluctuating measurements were telling us that the sun varies, but these new results say something different. While just about everything else in the sun changes along with its 11-year sunspot cycle, the shape doesn't."
This work was supported by NASA grants to Stanford University and the University of Hawaii.
More information about SDO:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0816150801.htm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19th August 2012, 09:16 AM
Glob Glob is offline
AFA Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 505
Default Re: The Precise Solar Shape and Its Variability

Only god could make something so perfectly round.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19th August 2012, 09:34 AM
AUSloth's Avatar
AUSloth AUSloth is offline
Galileo's salute to the church, going on 400 years now.
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Wetsunday
Posts: 4,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glob View Post
Only god could make something so perfectly round.
Ha! God is gravity works better than god is love )
__________________
"I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." ...Stephen F Roberts
"Willingness to reexamine facts objectively is the difference between a scientist and a theologian" ...RationalWiki
"If one could make one change, and only one, mine would be to distinguish the numinous from the supernatural" - Hitch
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.