Go Back   AFA Forums > News and Social > News and Current Affairs

News and Current Affairs News reports related to (but not restricted to) religion, atheism and woo.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 10th August 2017, 10:44 AM
Mjt's Avatar
Mjt Mjt is offline
AFA Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: rural
Posts: 5,681
Default Liberal Party votes no change on same-sex marriage policy

Does anyone know if this is true?
Black Feminist Ranter - Celeste Liddle


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Twisted Sister

Last edited by Mjt; 10th August 2017 at 10:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10th August 2017, 10:53 AM
The Irreverent Mr Black's Avatar
The Irreverent Mr Black The Irreverent Mr Black is offline
Deepity-packed chopper
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toontown
Posts: 2,240
Default Re: Liberal Party votes no change on same-sex marriage policy

Quote:
Mjt said View Post
Does anyone know if this is true?
Black Feminist Ranter - Celeste Liddle


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd give the idea quite a bit of credibility. AusPost service, even here in a reasonable-sized inland city, is now less-than-reliable.

Areas without business voters and economy of scale must really be copping it.
__________________

All your mistakes are lurking at Archive.org

Reply With Quote
Like wolty liked this post
  #23  
Old 10th August 2017, 12:04 PM
The Irreverent Mr Black's Avatar
The Irreverent Mr Black The Irreverent Mr Black is offline
Deepity-packed chopper
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toontown
Posts: 2,240
Default Re: Liberal Party votes no change on same-sex marriage policy

And now this! Arses will be lied off...

Quote:
Lobbyists on both sides of the marriage equality debate will be free to distribute misleading and deceptive material ahead of the same-sex marriage postal vote, because the usual campaign rules have been discarded.

In order to circumvent the Senate, the Turnbull government's optional marriage survey will be conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, meaning the safeguards of the Commonwealth Electoral Act would not apply.
Read the rest and get really fucking angry about this waste of $122 mil plus.
__________________

All your mistakes are lurking at Archive.org

Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10th August 2017, 12:42 PM
The Irreverent Mr Black's Avatar
The Irreverent Mr Black The Irreverent Mr Black is offline
Deepity-packed chopper
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toontown
Posts: 2,240
Default Re: Liberal Party votes no change on same-sex marriage policy

Some prominent Australians are boycotting the weak-as-shite, I mean plebiscite, but you humble Goat would urge them (and you) to not only participate, but go one better.

Send back a rainbow flag with your papers, or write a personal message the Malcom the Invertebrate along with your vote.

It's going to AusBureauStats, not the Electoral Commission, so it's unclear what the scrutineering process will be, but the token poll

(not to be confused with one of these)
is a chance to get a message through.

Don't you ever let a chance go by...
__________________

All your mistakes are lurking at Archive.org

Reply With Quote
Like Mjt, Cirrusly, wolty liked this post
  #25  
Old 10th August 2017, 02:19 PM
Blue Lightning's Avatar
Blue Lightning Blue Lightning is offline
"Mr Charles Darwin had the gall to ask"
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,872
Default Re: Liberal Party votes no change on same-sex marriage policy

Lots of coverage in this morning's Guardian:

David Marr -

Abbott's obstruction of gay marriage is a defence of privilege and the power of shame
It isn’t ‘freedom’ that the former prime minister and the bishops uphold – it’s their power to dictate the laws of marriage to the rest of us


Quote:
If only Christians fought like this for refugees. Imagine if the Coalition’s big men of faith threatened to tear down their own government unless it brings home the wretches we’ve imprisoned in the Pacific.

Surely there couldn’t be a greater service for Christ?

Or what about crossing the floor for the poor, the homeless, for battered wives and illiterate Aboriginal kids. No. What excites these Christian warriors is beating up on gays. ...


Katherine Murphy -

Is Abbott about to wreck marriage equality? You bet you are. You bet I am
In his quest for the thing that constantly eludes him – status elevation – the prime minister in exile has Turnbull dancing to his tune, like a limp puppet on a string


Quote:
...

For Abbott, holding back the scourge of progressivism is a vocation, a holy crusade, a righteous undertaking.

Elevating it to a calling took that little extra rhetorical flourish of saying no to political correctness. Voting no would not only stop the legalisation of same-sex marriage, it would help to stop political correctness in its tracks.

You could almost see him rehearsing that insight in the bathroom mirror …
Penny Wong in the Senate -

Penny Wong's emotional speech: same-sex marriage plebiscite 'exposing our children to hatred' – video

Quote:
Labor frontbencher Penny Wong has delivered an impassioned speech in the Senate opposing the government’s plan to hold a plebiscite or potentially a postal vote on whether same-sex couple should be allowed to marry. Wong said advocates of a plebiscite should read commentary on families with gay parents, including the Australian Christian Lobby calling their children a ‘stolen generation’. ‘It’s exposing our children to that kind of hatred,’ Wong said


More at links.
__________________
"Just stick to the idea that science is just about making descriptive models of natural phenomena, whose emergent predictions are tested to destruction" - Woof!
"Science is what we have learned about how to keep from fooling ourselves" - Richard Feynman
Reply With Quote
Like DanDare, wolty liked this post
Thank The Irreverent Mr Black, DanDare thanked this post
  #26  
Old 10th August 2017, 03:12 PM
stylofone's Avatar
stylofone stylofone is offline
I am no feeble Christ, not me.
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,014
Default Re: Liberal Party votes no change on same-sex marriage policy

I came here to link to that David Marr article, but you were here first. It's good, I think I want to marry HIM.

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10th August 2017, 03:25 PM
Blue Lightning's Avatar
Blue Lightning Blue Lightning is offline
"Mr Charles Darwin had the gall to ask"
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,872
Default Re: Liberal Party votes no change on same-sex marriage policy

@stylofone- He's a wonderful journalist!

And I want Penny for PM!
__________________
"Just stick to the idea that science is just about making descriptive models of natural phenomena, whose emergent predictions are tested to destruction" - Woof!
"Science is what we have learned about how to keep from fooling ourselves" - Richard Feynman
Reply With Quote
Like Mjt, DanDare, loubert, joele, stylofone and 1 others liked this post
Thank The Irreverent Mr Black thanked this post
  #28  
Old 10th August 2017, 05:01 PM
Stub King's Avatar
Stub King Stub King is offline
Take my advice, don't listen to me
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 708
Default Re: Liberal Party votes no change on same-sex marriage policy

Quote:
The Irreverent Mr Black said View Post
And now this! Arses will be lied off...


Read the rest and get really fucking angry about this waste of $122 mil plus.
Wilkie and the Marriage Equality group will launch a high court challenge. hopefully they are successful
__________________
The less people know, the more stubbornly they know it. (Osho)
Reply With Quote
Like Mjt, DanDare, wolty liked this post
Thank The Irreverent Mr Black thanked this post
  #29  
Old 10th August 2017, 09:33 PM
Blue Lightning's Avatar
Blue Lightning Blue Lightning is offline
"Mr Charles Darwin had the gall to ask"
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,872
Default Re: Liberal Party votes no change on same-sex marriage policy

Quote:
Blue Lightning said View Post
Quote:
Lord Blackadder said View Post
Shorten is as effective as a cat flap in an elephant house ...*cough* same sex marriage
Now, I am really puzzled.

What do you mean by that?
Hmmm ...

Hansard for the House of Representatives on 10/08/2017

Quote:
Mr SHORTEN (Maribyrnong—Leader of the Opposition) (15:12):

Marriage equality is important and it matters. It's not the biggest challenge that Australia faces and it's not something that requires a three-month campaign and a $122 million optional survey. We could be here right now voting for marriage equality as the elected representatives of the people of Australia, just as we do on national security, on Medicare, on education and on the matters that touch the lives of every citizen of our nation, but the government have decided that gay people should be subject to a different law making process. They think that same-sex couples should have to write to everyone else in this country for the permission to get married. They think that LGBTI Australians should have to ask permission to be considered equal to Australians who will not even see the law they are casting an opinion on. This is wrong. It is a ridiculous waste of time and taxpayer money.

On Tuesday, we remembered Dr G Yunupingu, who died of kidney disease, yet $122 million would fund dialysis in remote communities for decades. It's National Homelessness Week, and $122 million would provide 2,000 new beds for people currently sleeping rough. We could put 1,900 new teachers in our schools, we could train 4,500 new nurses or we could help auto workers find new jobs and new industries. But because of his weakness the Prime Minister is spending $122 million to try to save his own job.

This is a method of voting which is calculated to disenfranchise Australians, particularly young people and people not that well off. That last paragraph is a direct quote from the Prime Minister, back when he used to believe in something, before his ambitions seduced his ideals. We have already seen the ugliness this debate holds for LGBTI Australians and their families. Extremists are rerunning their old smears against same-sex couples and their children. The member for Warringah is out there claiming this is a vote on political correctness and on religious freedom. The disgraced former Speaker, Bronwyn Bishop, has spoken about polygamy, bestiality and killing children with disability.

Every hateful ideological hobby horse will be saddled up for this vote. And it is clear who is responsible: in less than 48 hours the Prime Minister has gone from promising to call out extreme voices to saying they're entitled to their view. He's gone from guaranteeing a respectful debate to saying it's up to individuals. He calls that strong leadership. Strong leaders do not need to say, 'I'm a strong leader'; they prove it by acting on their convictions, by fighting for what they believe in and even by taking a political risk. Strong leaders lead; they do not stand by and allow children of same-sex couples to be treated as pawns.

And yesterday we learned that the Australian electoral rules will not even apply to this vote. There will be no protection against ballot fraud, electoral bribery, intimidation, interfering with the electoral roll or publishing misleading and deceptive material. Who can forget that pathetic red-faced public tantrum from the Prime Minister on election night, when he sooked about one text message. Now he is giving his blessing to billboards, websites, pamphlets, TV advertising and online material that will vilify and demean LGBTI Australians and their children. We know this bile will end up in the playground, in the schoolyard and on the sporting field. The slogans will be shouted at the children of same-sex couples. Young people who are gay will be confronted by it on social media every day. I loathe the trolls and the haters but I expected more from the Prime Minister. I hold the Prime Minister responsible for every hurtful bit of filth this debate will unleash. That is not because the Prime Minister has said it, not because the Prime Minister agrees with it—he clearly doesn't—but because the Prime Minister has licensed this debate. You are the leader, Mr Turnbull; you have given permission. I will never hold you in the same light again. I hold the Prime Minister responsible and Australians will too.

LGBTI Australians have every right to feel let down by their parliament today, every right to consider this postal survey the latest in a long line of insults. I don't blame them for that. I can understand why an LGBTI person receiving a survey—with the Australian coat of arms on the corner of the envelope and asking for everyone else to decide if you are equal—would want to chuck it in the bin. I wouldn't blame you. But let me say to you that that is what they want you to do. The strongest supporters of this survey have always been the most vocal opponents of marriage equality. They have stacked the deck against young people, against expats, against Australians who support equality but regard this vote as a waste of time. The opponents of marriage equality have set this process up to fail.

But we cannot let illegitimate tactics deter us; we cannot sit on the sidelines. I can understand LGBTI Australians' sense of frustration and of betrayal by the parliament. But the most powerful act of resistance is to vote yes for equality. Maintain your hope, maintain your enthusiasm and vote yes. And make sure your friends, relatives, colleague, classmates and teammates vote yes too. Get your name on the electoral roll today; make your voice heard.

Voting yes is not about endorsing this illegitimate process, it's about refusing to walk past our fellow Australians when they need us. This is my message for business leaders, sporting clubs, the union movement and community groups: it's time to get involved; it's time to organise and fight for equality. This survey is costly, this survey is unnecessary, this survey places unfair pressure on one group of Australians to justify their relationships. This survey is a political contrivance from a Prime Minister who spends all his time counting Newspolls. This survey denies the parliament the chance to lead. We didn't need a survey to tell us to say sorry. We in this parliament led; we did the right thing and the community backed us.

This $122 million survey denigrates the parliament. It risks putting Australia in a hell of a place, further behind the rest of the world. But there is one thing this survey will not do: it will not change Labor's support for marriage equality. If Prime Minister Turnbull stops blocking marriage equality legislation from coming into this parliament, the men and women of the federal Parliamentary Labor Party will vote for equality in overwhelming numbers; and if it is not resolved by the next election, a new Labor government will legislate to make marriage equality a reality within the first 100 days. No slew of discredited surveys will deter us.

Parliament created these laws. It is time for parliament to amend them. We didn't have a survey for the other 20 changes to the Marriage Act, and we don't need one now. The Prime Minister has abdicated responsibility for change. He has declared himself too busy to campaign for it, but he's prepared to unleash this public farce on the citizens of Australia but not prepared to take responsibility for its outcomes or its consequences. In two years of a prime ministership defined by moral cowardice, this is a new low, but in the end it is not even about what the Liberals or the Nats or Labor think; it's about our fellow Australians.

My final message to LGBTI people is this, and it's a message to their parents and their siblings and their children and everyone who loves them: I know this has been a week of heartbreak, following years of disappointments. I know that some Liberals worked hard not to have this outcome, and I respect them for that. I know that LGBTI Australians are frustrated, they're angry, they're sad, and they're bewildered that it has come to this. But I want you to know: you are not alone. You are not alone in this fight ahead. Over the next few months, terrible things will be said about you and your families, about your lives, your identities and your choices, and the Prime Minister will not stand up for you. I am sorry you have to endure this. But Labor will stand up for Australians. I give you this promise: we stand with you. When you don't feel like you have a voice, we will speak up for you. When you feel attacked, we will defend you. When we hear prejudice and discrimination, we will not cross the road and pretend it is not happening; we will call it out.

I will be voting yes. I will be campaigning for a yes vote. I will do my bit, and I encourage people to join the movement for marriage equality, because no true leader is ever too busy to fight for the fair go in this country. Equality is not a diary appointment that you meet in three or six or eight months time. We say to young Australians who are gay: we are voting in this survey, we are participating in this survey, because of you—not because we respect the process but because the Labor Party will not let gay Australians and young gay people cope with this survey, this evaluation of their relationships, on their own. I say to LGBTI Australians: while ever there is a Labor Party, you are never on your own.
__________________
"Just stick to the idea that science is just about making descriptive models of natural phenomena, whose emergent predictions are tested to destruction" - Woof!
"Science is what we have learned about how to keep from fooling ourselves" - Richard Feynman

Last edited by Blue Lightning; 10th August 2017 at 09:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
Like bruce1937 liked this post
Thank The Irreverent Mr Black thanked this post
  #30  
Old 10th August 2017, 10:37 PM
Blue Lightning's Avatar
Blue Lightning Blue Lightning is offline
"Mr Charles Darwin had the gall to ask"
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,872
Default Re: Liberal Party votes no change on same-sex marriage policy

Further to that, Katherine Murphy in The Guardian -

Shorten's impassioned 'yes' plea for marriage equality channels both empathy and outrage

Quote:
Bill Shorten looked distant during question time – keyed up, like an athlete before an explosive sprint. Periodically he flicked through the text of a speech, a mental composition already running in his head, absent from the fray.

Little wonder he was distracted. When the Labor leader got to his feet for the matter of public importance speech after question time, it was for one of those rare moments that happen in politics, the moments that are genuinely electrifying.

It was going to be a ridiculously audacious speech.

Shorten was going characterise the postal plebiscite as a complete dog, a process set up to fail by the opponents of marriage equality. Having given a comprehensive shopping list of reasons to boycott the whole sideshow, Shorten was then going to pivot, radically, and rally the vote.

Shorten was going to tell Australians to sign up, not as an act of submission, but as an act of subversion. “The most powerful act of resistance and defiance is to vote yes for equality,” the Labor leader said, hands trembling ever so slightly on the dispatch box.

“Maintain your hope, maintain your enthusiasm. Vote yes and make sure that your friends and relatives and colleagues and classmates and teammates vote yes too. Get your name on the electoral roll today, make your voice heard”.

Empathy intersected with outrage. “Voting yes is not about endorsing this illegitimate process, it’s about refusing to walk past our fellow Australians when they need us”.

Shorten was going to do two things with his intervention.

The first was stand on his opponent’s throat. The Labor leader intended to hang this shoddy process, and any or all of its ugly consequences, squarely around the neck of the prime minister: “I hold you responsible, for every hurtful bit of filth that this debate will unleash”.

The second basic political objective was binding Labor’s cause to progress, to weave the threads of his own political movement through an epochal cultural and social shift, where support for marriage equality had gone from a minority preoccupation to a mainstream cause.

...

In the moment Shorten laid it all on the line in the chamber, when he chose a side and owned the cause …
Also, video snippets in Mark Kelly's SMH piece, here -

This speech was one of the biggest moments in Bill Shorten's path to The Lodge
__________________
"Just stick to the idea that science is just about making descriptive models of natural phenomena, whose emergent predictions are tested to destruction" - Woof!
"Science is what we have learned about how to keep from fooling ourselves" - Richard Feynman

Last edited by Blue Lightning; 10th August 2017 at 10:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
Thank The Irreverent Mr Black, DanDare thanked this post
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 02:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.