AFA Forums The You Tube and Media Thread
 Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

 Off Topic For anything that doesn't fit anywhere above.

#2011
12th December 2016, 10:34 PM
 Goldenmane Cuss-tard Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Perth, Western Australia Posts: 6,956
Re: The You Tube and Media Thread

Quote:
 knowledge is power said Do I put this here? Five dudes and a piano https://www.youtube.com/embed/9MQc9MTafU4"
Yes, you absolutely do.

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk
__________________
-Geoff Rogers

@Goldenmane3

#2012
22nd December 2016, 08:26 PM
 loubert Roll a d20 and.... shit! Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Townsville Posts: 4,352
Re: The You Tube and Media Thread

__________________
Prejudices are what fools use for reason. Voltaire

 knowledge is power laughed at this post
#2013
25th December 2016, 08:29 PM
 DanDare Religion or Reality, choose... Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Posts: 7,308
Re: The You Tube and Media Thread

Bwahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

__________________
"History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government".
-Thomas Jefferson

Burden of proof is the obligation on somebody presenting a claim to provide evidence to support its truth (a warrant). Once evidence has been presented, it is up to any opposing "side" to show the evidence presented is not adequate. If claims were accepted without warrants, then every claim could simultaneously be claimed to be true.

History isn't written by the victors. It's written by the people with the time machines.
#2014
11th January 2017, 01:09 AM
 DanDare Religion or Reality, choose... Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Posts: 7,308
Re: The You Tube and Media Thread

__________________
"History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government".
-Thomas Jefferson

Burden of proof is the obligation on somebody presenting a claim to provide evidence to support its truth (a warrant). Once evidence has been presented, it is up to any opposing "side" to show the evidence presented is not adequate. If claims were accepted without warrants, then every claim could simultaneously be claimed to be true.

History isn't written by the victors. It's written by the people with the time machines.
#2015
11th January 2017, 10:32 AM
 cyclist And if I can reach the pedals, I'll be sweet Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Sydney Posts: 2,973
Re: The You Tube and Media Thread

Quote:
 DanDare said
For those interested, here is a good article on the whole Centrelink Debt Recover problem.

Quote:
 Part of the crackdown – a part repeatedly trumpeted by the government as a success – was to use “data matching” to identify “cheats”. If someone received a Centrelink payment, the income they reported would be cross-checked automatically with the Australian Tax Office; if there was a discrepancy, a debt would be created representing the alleged “overpayment”, and a letter sent to the recipient.
Quote:
 The “errors” are very simple to understand: If you earn over a set threshold in a fortnight, your benefit is reduced. Earn enough, and the benefit should be zero; The time unit is, however, a fortnight, but the Australian Tax Office doesn't care about fortnights, only years; Centrelink's developers divided the ATO earnings data by 26 because they were told to write the software that way; When “yearly / 26” yielded an amount over the benefit threshold, a debt was created and recipients could only change this by challenging the calculation, with records to back them up, as much as six years back.
So in short hand, if you worked for a period of time, and then went onto welfare, and the amount that you earned when divided by 26 was over the threshold, then the debt recovery system believes that you shouldn't have been paid the welfare.
#2016
11th January 2017, 01:00 PM
 Sieveboy Being a bigot makes me sick. Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Not in bible land, Perth Posts: 5,466

I ran the numbers back of the envelope style and based on new start of $264 per week, or$13,728 per year and the government stating it will reclaim $4.5b going back six years, I estimate that government believes it has the right to claw back 327,797 years worth of new start paid to people. ($4.5b/\$13,728)

Given that the unemployment has rarely dipped below 600k since 2010, we can state that there has been 3,600,000 years worth of people unemployed since 2010. (600,000 * 6 years)

Combining these 2 figures we can see that the government reckons 9.1% of all new start recipients received it in error (327,797/3,600,000) The actual numbers would probably be higher as not all unemployed are eligible for new start.

Now if this buggy system branches put into other pensions and family tax benefits then the equation would change. Either way it is an ideological shit show and it scares me because data mining is a valid way to identify anomalies to investigate. Key word: INVESTIGATE. Which is how I have used data mining professionally in the past and it works well. This is the dark side of this.
__________________
I do not fear death, in view of the fact that I had been dead for billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it.
Mark Twain
#2017
13th January 2017, 07:28 PM
 DanDare Religion or Reality, choose... Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Posts: 7,308
Re: The You Tube and Media Thread

The new start claw back is bad for several reasons:
1) The formula assumes periods of unemployment benefit are erased by amounts earned outside the unemployment time.
2) The government is using an automatic system rather than double checking and investigating before acting. That means they have created a form of automatic con on people who are already facing difficulties.
3) The actual likely amount to regain for real fraud cases is likely to be miniscule compared with so many other things the government could deal with, such as corporate tax evasion.
4) The action is probably intended to make people afraid to claim in the first place.
__________________
"History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government".
-Thomas Jefferson

Burden of proof is the obligation on somebody presenting a claim to provide evidence to support its truth (a warrant). Once evidence has been presented, it is up to any opposing "side" to show the evidence presented is not adequate. If claims were accepted without warrants, then every claim could simultaneously be claimed to be true.

History isn't written by the victors. It's written by the people with the time machines.
 Strato liked this post
#2018
13th January 2017, 10:10 PM
 loubert Roll a d20 and.... shit! Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Townsville Posts: 4,352
Re: The You Tube and Media Thread

__________________
Prejudices are what fools use for reason. Voltaire

#2019
13th January 2017, 10:26 PM
 Sieveboy Being a bigot makes me sick. Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Not in bible land, Perth Posts: 5,466
Re: The You Tube and Media Thread

Quote:
 DanDare said The new start claw back is bad for several reasons: 1) The formula assumes periods of unemployment benefit are erased by amounts earned outside the unemployment time. 2) The government is using an automatic system rather than double checking and investigating before acting. That means they have created a form of automatic con on people who are already facing difficulties. 3) The actual likely amount to regain for real fraud cases is likely to be miniscule compared with so many other things the government could deal with, such as corporate tax evasion. 4) The action is probably intended to make people afraid to claim in the first place.
All pretty much correct.
__________________
I do not fear death, in view of the fact that I had been dead for billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it.
Mark Twain
#2020
15th January 2017, 12:51 AM
 Loki You get what everyone gets....you get a lifetime Moderator Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Up the creek Posts: 10,839
Re: The You Tube and Media Thread

__________________
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."Philip K. Dick

 loubert, DanDare liked this post

 Bookmarks