Go Back   AFA Forums > Atheism > Debate Forum

Debate Forum The AFA Debate forum. Set up your debate or join the peanut gallery in here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 12th April 2017, 02:37 AM
THWOTH's Avatar
THWOTH THWOTH is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Cotswolds, UK
Posts: 666
Default Re: Should the ABC Religion and Ethics website be closed?

I read the op-ed in the link with interest, and mounting pity: those poor religious broadcasters, so
convinced of the virtues of communicating the wonders of faith, forlornly confronted by fact of their increasing irrelevance. Many must be asking themselves, "Why do I even bother?"

The tone of the piece seemed to imply that religion and, therefore, religious broadcasting was necessary. As one of the comments below the rambling blurb said: "Why? How?" For such a straightforward comment to accrue a considerable number of up-votes suggests (to me anyway) that many people are dumbfounded by religion in secular soceties that have shaken off many of the religious imperatives that were taken for granted only a generation ago. Why do we (society) need religious broadcasting? How is religious broadcasting necessary? What even is the point of religion? That these kinds of questions are being openly asked is a very positive sign imo.
__________________
...never eat your own nose...
Reply With Quote
Dislike manabouttown disliked this post
  #12  
Old 22nd May 2017, 10:24 AM
DanDare's Avatar
DanDare DanDare is offline
Religion or Reality, choose...
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,324
Default Re: Should the ABC Religion and Ethics website be closed?

I would argue strongly for it to be replaced with an ethics and philosophy department. This seems to be one of those cases where religion attempts to appropriate all ethics and thought to itself, as if that's the only way to do it all.
__________________
"History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government".
-Thomas Jefferson

Burden of proof is the obligation on somebody presenting a claim to provide evidence to support its truth (a warrant). Once evidence has been presented, it is up to any opposing "side" to show the evidence presented is not adequate. If claims were accepted without warrants, then every claim could simultaneously be claimed to be true.

History isn't written by the victors. It's written by the people with the time machines.
Reply With Quote
Dislike manabouttown disliked this post
Thank The Irreverent Mr Black thanked this post
  #13  
Old 22nd May 2017, 12:34 PM
Darwinsbulldog's Avatar
Darwinsbulldog Darwinsbulldog is offline
AFA Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 17,930
Default Re: Should the ABC Religion and Ethics website be closed?

It is all part of a greater disease that assumes "normal" people will automatically want to watch sport, so TV, radio, newspapers have plenty of sport, often to saturation level. I suppose we should be grateful that there is more diversity in sport broadcasting, including the brand new idea that women actually play sport!

I don't fucking CARE if a sporting hero has haemorrhoids, nor do I wish to know the latest on the magical sky fairy. Or fans of either.

And while we are on the subject, footy stadiums and cathedrals are not fucking infrastructure. Roads, rail, ports, hospitals energy supply and schools are fucking infrastructure. And the business of government. Mosques and tennis courts are NOT infrastructure, or at least, not infrastructure that should be funded by government.

Jesus fucking Haploid Christ in footy boots, when will these morons learn a bit of manners and get the fuck out of our faces!
__________________
Just stick to the idea that science tests falsifyable hypotheses to destruction.
Reply With Quote
Like DanDare, manabouttown liked this post
  #14  
Old 28th June 2017, 06:06 AM
David_Frisken David_Frisken is offline
AFA Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 46
Default Re: Should the ABC Religion and Ethics website be closed?

Is this a recent sub site, a year or so? I have seen the banner once before while surfing, but didn't realise the scope. Where is the page for the rest of the countries ethics?

Why tie Ethics to Religion. Religion is absolute, they are unrelated.

It should be an easy one to get altered or pulled down. Is someone working on this?

How many religious staff do they have? Do they pay for the stories?

This should be dealt with.


I was onto them a few months ago after being offended by Tim Costello promoting child abuse. I asked why I wasn't given a warning like they give other groups?

I asked about the warning that authorises the belief, of Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islanders. "Where is that from, which Aboriginal group?". I then stated that I was unaware of any Aboriginals who had cameras in history. That I had asked many Aboriginal friends, and they had no clue what this was about.

The Aboriginal liaison(or whatever title) then want on to explain that it is a certain group, but they can't remember who.

What is all of that crap about?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.