![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Ask an Atheist Want to know Atheists' viewpoints on things? Want to better understand the Atheist worldview? Here's the place. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would like to know people opinions on this topic.
Do you believe there is, Don't believe? If so why.
__________________
blah blah blah blah Ive seen and experienced spirits, they go well with coke |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The short answer is yes. I believe that, chances are there is life outside of our universe. What sort of life, who knows. The odds are very very good that there is some form of life ( single cell organisms ) somewhere else in the universe. The problem is that we will probably never know because everywhere else is just so far away.
My best friend has a bag packed next to his bed, just incase he is ever abducted by aliens. I respect him alot for that. Of course the greatest movie of all time ( Star Wars ) was actually a documentary. As is The Hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy. All completly true.
__________________
. . . “Sir,' I said to the universe, 'I exist.' 'That,' said the universe, 'creates no sense of obligation in me whatsoever.” ― Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy The Nizkor Project- Logical Fallacies Atheist: n; A person to be pitied in that he is unable to believe things for which there is no evidence, and who has thus deprived himself of a convenient means of feeling superior to others. —Chaz Bufe, The American Heretic’s Dictionary
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Does he realise that he might not be abducted from his bedroom and he might not be able to go back for his toothbrush? I thought you had to be driving along a deserted country road at night time in Hicksville USA to be a target for alien abduction.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
. . . “Sir,' I said to the universe, 'I exist.' 'That,' said the universe, 'creates no sense of obligation in me whatsoever.” ― Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy The Nizkor Project- Logical Fallacies Atheist: n; A person to be pitied in that he is unable to believe things for which there is no evidence, and who has thus deprived himself of a convenient means of feeling superior to others. —Chaz Bufe, The American Heretic’s Dictionary
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sounds like he is looking forward to it.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well I guess believing in aliens is more plausible than believing in God
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great question to get the mind thinking.
In short - I think the chances for simple, microscopic life are very good. I base this mostly on the fact that amino acids seem to form quite easily (Miller-Urey Experiment), the fact that the majority of chemicals that make up life-as-we-know-it are common in the Universe (Carbon, Nitrogen, Oxygen, etc), the fact that Exoplanets in a Goldilocks Zone may be fairly common, etc. I also think we are not alone because I dislike the idea that Earth and its life being a fluke - it smacks of special circumstances that are too reminiscent of the human-centric views of the earlier humans. It may still be correct, but i'd prefer to think we are not too special. I do, however, think that the "Rare Earth" hypothesis has some merit - that perhaps complex life, the kind of "bags of water" that makes up macroscopic life on this planet, may be rare. The reason I think this, is because: - Exoplanets may be common, but not commonly within the Goldilocks-Zone where water can remain liquid. (Water appears to be an excellent solvent for chemical reactions, although other chemicals have been proposed, i.e. liquid methane on the planet Titan, for instance) - Many Exoplanets may exist in parts of galaxies that are inheritently unstable - i.e. being too close to a galactic core may mean being pummelled every few million years by gamma rays, being in parts of galaxies that are metal poor may mean that rocky planets don't form readily, etc. In short, I think that the fact that Earth had simple, microscopic life for most of its existence and only macroscopic, multi-cellular life late in the story suggests that the move from simple to complex isn't necessarily a quick or simple process. Having said all this, theres a huge problem in all our reasoning on this topic - we have a sample size of 1 - the Earth.
__________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" - Carl Sagan |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, I don't know.
I've seen some estimate the age of the universe as 14billion yrs. I've seen other estimates that say, 10billion yrs. Since the estimated age of the earth is 4.5billion yrs., I wouldn't expect there to be much life out there. And no, I wouldn't consider us to be late bloomers, either. I would expect the universe to be teeming with life one day. But, because they say the universe is expanding, I wouldn't expect much social contact between us and our extra-terrestrial cousins. I'd be surprised if we don't end up, over-populating ourselves to near-extinction soon. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
"We're more likely to cause our own extinction"
__________________
An atheist hears a voice in their head, they're delusional. A theist hears a voice in their head and it's providence. Monkey killing monkey killing monkey over pieces of the ground. Tool mmm go figure http://betterhuman.org/ Last edited by robertkd; 15th September 2009 at 07:01 PM. Reason: somehow didn't finish the sentence doh! |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Because they say the universe is expanding, I wouldn't expect much social contact between any extra-terrestrials, come to think of it.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|