Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: 5 Stages of Religious Evolution

  1. #11
    workmx's Avatar
    workmx is offline Feminazi and semi-professional inconoclast
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    6,155

    Default Re: 5 Stages of Religious Evolution

    Welcome to the wonderfully complicated world of the sociologist.
    Forgive me, I'm a sociologist and high horse slut!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    19,160

    Default Re: 5 Stages of Religious Evolution

    Quote workmx said View Post
    That. And human societies don't evolve.

    The history of humanity is the autobiography of a lunatic.
    Yeah they do, jist not any particular direction, just like biological evolution.
    Just stick to the idea that science tests falsifiable hypotheses to destruction.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Toontown, in the Bible Belt.
    Posts
    7,374

    Default Re: 5 Stages of Religious Evolution

    Quote workmx said View Post
    Quote The Irreverent Mr Black said View Post
    It's an interesting hypothesis, so far.

    Are there any particular studies or books which helped form it?
    Not sure that this is a hypothesis: is it falsifiable or testable?
    Wiki
    A hypothesis (plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous observations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories. Even though the words "hypothesis" and "theory" are often used synonymously, a scientific hypothesis is not the same as a scientific theory. A working hypothesis is a provisionally accepted hypothesis proposed for further research.[1]
    I never called it scientific.

    I didn't see any testing, and thus didn't regard the set of ideas as constituting a theory.
    EJB

    Iím not one of the dead ones yet. - Ms Fishie.


  4. #14
    workmx's Avatar
    workmx is offline Feminazi and semi-professional inconoclast
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    6,155

    Default Re: 5 Stages of Religious Evolution

    Quote Darwinsbulldog said View Post
    Quote workmx said View Post
    That. And human societies don't evolve.

    The history of humanity is the autobiography of a lunatic.
    Yeah they do, jist not any particular direction, just like biological evolution.
    But they are not better adapted to their environment... It is artificial selection, not natural.
    Forgive me, I'm a sociologist and high horse slut!

  5. #15
    workmx's Avatar
    workmx is offline Feminazi and semi-professional inconoclast
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    6,155

    Default Re: 5 Stages of Religious Evolution

    The social sciences left behind the idea that societies always evolve to be better adapted in the 19th century (the idea had dangerous consequences, mostly for the undeveloped and powerless).
    Forgive me, I'm a sociologist and high horse slut!

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    19,160

    Default Re: 5 Stages of Religious Evolution

    Quote workmx said View Post
    But they are not better adapted to their environment... It is artificial selection, not natural.
    The social animal [including humans] have to serve two masters: the "reality" of [perceived] nature, and the "reality" of social constructions [like religion].

    The bias in nature for social animals is to give a high default value to social info over individual perceptions. This seems to hold true from bumble bees to humans. Religion thrives on this trait.

    Quorum sensing really.

    Well adjusted individuals find some sort of compromise, even at the cost of some loss of reality. They either compartmentalise, or suffer from cognitive dissonance.

    Social info is "meant" to generally be of net worth to the group, and hence by extension, to the average individual. Which is why it is selected for on the biological level, and generally reinforced at the cultural level.

    Probably wise, despite being vulnerable to parasitic memes like religion, because individuals of course, can have delusions, interpret data wrongly etc due to some environmental factor [parasite altering behaviour] or developmental anomaly etc.

    So consensus is often, but not always right. Hence the strong attachment that many people have to argumentum ad populum.
    Just stick to the idea that science tests falsifiable hypotheses to destruction.

  7. Like button SEG liked this post
  8. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    7,503

    Default Re: 5 Stages of Religious Evolution

    Quote stevebrooks said View Post
    Personally I think you are mistaking the development of society for the evolution of religion. Religions don't evolve, they change to suite the society. For instant we still have pantheist religions in Hinduism and others, we still have animist religions in Africa.

    Western society has moved in a direction where religion is no longer necessary, but not because religion has evolved but because western society has developed, for the most part, in a direction where individual rights and freedoms are valued. But there's no reason, as an example Russia, why society can't go in the other direction and religion become more dominant.
    That sounds a bit like "if we came from monkeys why are there still monkeys?".
    Ideas propagate, some with more accuracy than others. Any set of ideas with an individual can change in that individual over time. Many ideas in a society become conformist. They lock in and are patrolled to eliminate variants. Some become the new normal. Religions evolve over time among the population that know of them.
    "History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government".
    -Thomas Jefferson

    Burden of proof is the obligation on somebody presenting a claim to provide evidence to support its truth (a warrant). Once evidence has been presented, it is up to any opposing "side" to show the evidence presented is not adequate. If claims were accepted without warrants, then every claim could simultaneously be claimed to be true.

    History isn't written by the victors. It's written by the people with the time machines.

  9. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    5,169

    Default Re: 5 Stages of Religious Evolution

    Quote DanDare said View Post
    That sounds a bit like "if we came from monkeys why are there still monkeys?".
    Ideas propagate, some with more accuracy than others. Any set of ideas with an individual can change in that individual over time. Many ideas in a society become conformist. They lock in and are patrolled to eliminate variants. Some become the new normal. Religions evolve over time among the population that know of them.

    That's why I don't think religions can be said to evolve, there are many religions that no longer exist as religions, just as ancient fairy tales, but given the right people and circumstances these religions could be revived, ok it may be unlikely for many, but it could happen. In other words if there were no more monkeys, (not saying people evolved from monkey but a hypothetical you understand) you wouldn't expect monkeys to re-evolve by "backward evolution" as it were from more developed forms. Oh you might eventually, given enough time have a species evolve that resembled a monkey, but they wouldn't be monkeys. However you could conceivably see ancient religions re-established because they are ideas and ideas can be discarded and adopted depending on the society.


    In other words religions don't go extinct, they go out of style, like old 80's jeans, and like old 80's jeans they are rarely forgotten and often get looked back on with nostalgia, they can come back in style depending on the direction society takes.
    From the mouth of a seven year old: "When you're you're dead, you don't go anywhere!"

  10. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    19,160

    Default Re: 5 Stages of Religious Evolution

    Quote stevebrooks said View Post
    That's why I don't think religions can be said to evolve, there are many religions that no longer exist as religions, just as ancient fairy tales, but given the right people and circumstances these religions could be revived, ok it may be unlikely for many, but it could happen. In other words if there were no more monkeys, (not saying people evolved from monkey but a hypothetical you understand) you wouldn't expect monkeys to re-evolve by "backward evolution" as it were from more developed forms. Oh you might eventually, given enough time have a species evolve that resembled a monkey, but they wouldn't be monkeys. However you could conceivably see ancient religions re-established because they are ideas and ideas can be discarded and adopted depending on the society.


    In other words religions don't go extinct, they go out of style, like old 80's jeans, and like old 80's jeans they are rarely forgotten and often get looked back on with nostalgia, they can come back in style depending on the direction society takes.
    Well over 99% of all species on the planet have gone extinct. Extinction is a part of evolution. It isn't all beer and skittles.


    And even if a religious group goes extinct, a lot of the time religious memes continue on in other faiths. The Genesis story in the Bible was pinched from earlier stories and of course Jesus-like characters were not unique [Horus etc].


    Creationists have revived the idea of animism, which is [at least in theory] no longer a part of official religious doctrines for the major Abrahamic faiths.
    Just stick to the idea that science tests falsifiable hypotheses to destruction.

  11. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    23

    Default Re: 5 Stages of Religious Evolution

    I consider we are in the fifth and final stage of religion as we see information finally in the hands of the lay person to question things they are told. For all of time to date the lay person has had to trust people with so called knowledge to be telling them the facts, but in reality they have been scammed with lies and deceptions. I could never have joined information together as a lay person to see that the main author of the christian bible, St Paul, who wrote thirteen of the twenty seven books of the bible and quotes Jesus all over the place, never actually meet Jesus while he was alive and tells us in Galatians 1:11-16 he does not use information from any other person in any of his scriptures! But with the internet every lay person can confirm the facts for themselves and what is more share the facts between them rather than allowing some con artist to vet it all.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •