Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: The right to bear rights?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    19,160

    Default Re: The right to bear rights?

    Quote The Irreverent Mr Black said View Post
    Dat's very shellfish of you. Clam up or I'll send the hired mussel round.
    <giggles>
    Just stick to the idea that science tests falsifiable hypotheses to destruction.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    By the sea (I do like it)
    Posts
    3,653

    Default Re: The right to bear rights?

    Quote markwemple said View Post
    Just curious. How many here have attempted to learn the language of another species. Humans are extremely ego centric and give little thought to the plight of others. Now that may be in part true or not but to completely disrespect the opinion of others especially when I can be scientifically prove to improve the condition of the planet is pathetic BS. Justifying that your taste buds are more important than the life of another sentient creature is narrow, shallow and unjustified. IMO indefensible.
    Hello Mark
    I spend my days working with animals and none of them have shown that they are interested in me as anything other than either food or a threat.

    How would you convince an alien that you are sentient, capable of abstract thought, and possess rights? Your answer to this will shed some light on how much you have thought through the problem.

    I haven't seen anyone argue that their taste buds are more important than the life of an animal in this thread.

    As to humans being anthropocentric: meh. I accept that as fact, but until you show me that I should be otherwise, I don't think of it as an accusation because I don't see it as anything to be ashamed of. My cascade of concern starts with my immediate family, then my extended family, then my community, my society, other societies, then animals that are easily antrhopomorphised, then polychaetes, then all other animals, then plants, fungi, monera, and finishes with theologians and politicians who seek to institute religious mandates as law.

    It is instinct that gives me this frame work and it is evolutionary theory that explains it. Why should I reject this frame work by bumping any group up or down that scale of concern?
    Last edited by Worldslaziestbusker; 15th February 2012 at 02:54 PM.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    3rd Planet from the Sun
    Posts
    8,770

    Default Re: The right to bear rights?

    'Rights' as per the Universal Declaration of Human rights is roughly defined as "a conception of what is minimally required for individuals to have a chance to live free and flourishing lives"

    What is interesting is that where human rights have not been adequately defined, folk here seem to be identifying the concept of rights to be the same between human rights and animal rights, both protectionist and abolitionist. This to me seems to totally fail to understand the concept of animal rights as it stands, trying to associate it to human rights. It's a false analogy.

    The whole idea of human rights is one thing, but also as thinking beings we are able to agree to confer 'rights' or a level of ethical values in the way we treat other life forms. This is animal rights.

    To simply treat them as the same thing is wrong I think.
    Spearthrower: "There are words like vacuous & cunt that are applicable."

    (delta p)*(delta q) >= h/(4*pi) ----- An explanation of Logical Fallacies : http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies ----- ferox deo vacuus vinco ----- How do I post video etc here?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    3rd Planet from the Sun
    Posts
    8,770

    Default Re: The right to bear rights?

    I'll add that people that are deeply involved in 'animal rights' tend to reject the concept of rights in general in favour of the concept of Equal consideration of interests.

    see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_c...n_of_interests
    Spearthrower: "There are words like vacuous & cunt that are applicable."

    (delta p)*(delta q) >= h/(4*pi) ----- An explanation of Logical Fallacies : http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies ----- ferox deo vacuus vinco ----- How do I post video etc here?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    By the sea (I do like it)
    Posts
    3,653

    Default Re: The right to bear rights?

    Quote davo said View Post
    I'll add that people that are deeply involved in 'animal rights' tend to reject the concept of rights in general in favour of the concept of Equal consideration of interests.

    see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_c...n_of_interests

    As is often the case, Davo, your contribution has prompted reading.
    Singer is being placed on hold at the library.
    Thanks
    Matt

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •