PDA

View Full Version : Pete Crowther unanswered questions


TÐöer
5th May 2009, 10:41 AM
Hi Pete,

I am ready to listen. Still waiting for a reply to my questions. I hope that they are reasonable and not asking for too much.

http://atheistfoundation.org.au/forums/showthread.php?p=12181#post12181 (http://atheistfoundation.org.au/forums/showthread.php?p=12181#post12181)
You've answered that we are all innately moral.

still got a few questions unanswered:

It depends. It is to say, that if we are to act or believe in something, It needs to be logically plausible. This applies not just in religion, but also to help us, from being fooled by others. Do you agree with me thus far?

The reason why many ask for scientific proof, is that the story so far, is not believable enough.
Assuming that God/Gods do exist. How do we tell which God is the 1 residing over this world? There are the hindu gods, the taoist gods, the ancient gods, Allah, the list goes on.

We must ask each party for proof is that not correct?
If you believe that the closeness you feel to your God is proof. Then what about the closeness believers of the other faiths feel?


If you can't contact with God directly, how do you know what you discuss is indeed right or wrong?

Inspiration from God? How do you know it was God, and not self or satan motivated?

There is already so many versions of religion, I am sure, there can only be 1 and not all that is inspired by God right?


First of all, it's not a belief that there is no God, but rather an absence of belief in God. As we have mentioned before. There is No god for us to believe. We cannot believe everything that is suggested by others. How else would we discern what is real and what is fake?

To say that to not believe in God is a "belief". Then it's the same as saying you "believe" there's no tooth fairy, santa clause, or hindu Gods. Is that really just a belief? or do you know that as fact?

If you don't answer them, then it is assumed that you agree.

Latest post awaiting your feedback:
Inconsistencies in Atheistic 'so called' logic on discussions about faith & reason
http://atheistfoundation.org.au/forums/showthread.php?p=12363#post12363 (http://atheistfoundation.org.au/forums/showthread.php?p=12363#post12363)

http://atheistfoundation.org.au/forums/showthread.php?p=12222#post12222 (http://atheistfoundation.org.au/forums/showthread.php?p=12222#post12222)

Faith & reason are not polar opposites
http://atheistfoundation.org.au/forums/showthread.php?p=12245#post12245 (http://atheistfoundation.org.au/forums/showthread.php?p=12245#post12245)

Christ's resurrection is historically valid
http://atheistfoundation.org.au/forums/showthread.php?p=12746#post12746

Thank You. Hope to hear from you soon.

ah... and don't forget these questions from youngmoigle

(1) Describe god.
(2) Prove god exists.

TÐöer
7th May 2009, 03:33 PM
*bump*

TÐöer
8th May 2009, 06:09 PM
Don't worry, The Doer. I'm sure Pete will reply to your question as soon as he finds where someone has already answered it.

Well, I hope he finds it fast. ;)